<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Curwoods Case Notes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://casenotes.curwoods.info/?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://casenotes.curwoods.info</link>
	<description>A Different Perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 00:01:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Structured settlements cold comfort for insurers &#8211; Kelly McCann v NSW Self Insurance Group [2012] NSWSC 488</title>
		<link>http://casenotes.curwoods.info/?p=1848</link>
		<comments>http://casenotes.curwoods.info/?p=1848#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 00:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>susanl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motor Vehicle Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://casenotes.curwoods.info/?p=1848</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://casenotes.curwoods.info/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1848</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Offers of Compromise not binding if incapable of acceptance &#8211; Vieira v O’Shea (No 2) [2012] NSWCA 121</title>
		<link>http://casenotes.curwoods.info/?p=1813</link>
		<comments>http://casenotes.curwoods.info/?p=1813#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 05:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>susanl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motor Vehicle Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Professional Indemnity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Risk Insurance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://casenotes.curwoods.info/?p=1813</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://casenotes.curwoods.info/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1813</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Valuer&#8217;s failure to consider comparable sales is not negligent &#8211; Provident Capital Limited v John Virtue Pty Ltd (No 2) [2012] NSWSC 319</title>
		<link>http://casenotes.curwoods.info/?p=1810</link>
		<comments>http://casenotes.curwoods.info/?p=1810#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 23:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>susanl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property Damage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://casenotes.curwoods.info/?p=1810</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://casenotes.curwoods.info/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1810</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Section 81 Notices &#8211; PCA allows second Section 81 Notice adding allegation of Contributory Negligence</title>
		<link>http://casenotes.curwoods.info/?p=1804</link>
		<comments>http://casenotes.curwoods.info/?p=1804#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 06:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>susanl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motor Vehicle Insurance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://casenotes.curwoods.info/?p=1804</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://casenotes.curwoods.info/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1804</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Claims for contribution under principles of double insurance where registered owner is not employer, a reasonable compromise is all that needs to be established &#8211; QBE Insurance (Australia) Ltd v CGU Workers Compensation (NSW) Ltd [2012] NSWSC 377</title>
		<link>http://casenotes.curwoods.info/?p=1801</link>
		<comments>http://casenotes.curwoods.info/?p=1801#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 05:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>susanl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motor Vehicle Insurance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://casenotes.curwoods.info/?p=1801</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://casenotes.curwoods.info/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1801</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Onus on insurer to prove residual earning capacity &#8211; QBE Insurance (Australia) Limited v Durkin and Ors [2012] NSWSC 72</title>
		<link>http://casenotes.curwoods.info/?p=1797</link>
		<comments>http://casenotes.curwoods.info/?p=1797#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 01:33:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>susanl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motor Vehicle Insurance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://casenotes.curwoods.info/?p=1797</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://casenotes.curwoods.info/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1797</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Limitation Period: Extension upheld &#8211; Suncorp Metway Insurance Limited v Norris [2012] QCA 101</title>
		<link>http://casenotes.curwoods.info/?p=1794</link>
		<comments>http://casenotes.curwoods.info/?p=1794#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 05:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>susanl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motor Vehicle Insurance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://casenotes.curwoods.info/?p=1794</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://casenotes.curwoods.info/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1794</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Accident on public road leading to building site – whether an occupier/builder owes a duty of care to the contract delivery driver &#8211; Miljus v Watpow Constructions Pty Ltd [2012] NSWCA 96</title>
		<link>http://casenotes.curwoods.info/?p=1789</link>
		<comments>http://casenotes.curwoods.info/?p=1789#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 02:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>susanl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property Damage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Risk Insurance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://casenotes.curwoods.info/?p=1789</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://casenotes.curwoods.info/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1789</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Section 109(2) clarification and failure of plaintiff to satisfy Section 73 for delay following retainment &#8211; Agyeman–Badu v The Nominal Defendant [2012] NSWDC 35</title>
		<link>http://casenotes.curwoods.info/?p=1786</link>
		<comments>http://casenotes.curwoods.info/?p=1786#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 02:57:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>susanl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motor Vehicle Insurance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://casenotes.curwoods.info/?p=1786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://casenotes.curwoods.info/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1786</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A medical practitioner&#8217;s duty to warn and causation &#8211; Wallace v Kam [2012] NSWCA 82</title>
		<link>http://casenotes.curwoods.info/?p=1783</link>
		<comments>http://casenotes.curwoods.info/?p=1783#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2012 23:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>susanl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Professional Indemnity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Risk Insurance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://casenotes.curwoods.info/?p=1783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://casenotes.curwoods.info/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1783</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

